SRE, Reliability Engineering & FinOps
How Clavon brings engineering discipline to reliability — defining SLOs, building observability, managing incidents, and connecting cloud cost to architectural decisions.
Why Reliability Isn't Engineered — And Why Cost Spirals
Reliability is treated as a vague aspiration until something breaks. Cost is tracked after it becomes a leadership problem. Both failures share the same root cause: no engineering discipline applied to either.
The consequence:
SRE exists to:
Service Level Indicators
The four measurable properties Clavon tracks as the foundation of SLO-based reliability management.
Three Required Signal Types
Reliability engineering requires all three observability signals — not just logs, not just metrics.
Metrics
System health and performance over time
Logs
Diagnostics and operational audit trail
Traces
Dependency analysis and latency breakdown
Who Owns Reliability
Reliability ownership is distributed — not centralized. Each role has specific accountability.
Product teams
Own the reliability of their services
Platform/SRE function
Define standards, tooling, and escalation model
Structured Incident Response
Test Reliability — Don't Hope for It
Cloud Cost Is an Engineering Problem
FinOps is not a finance function. It is an engineering discipline that connects cloud spend to the architectural decisions that drive it — so cost is managed continuously, not discovered in a quarterly report.
FinOps exists to:
Cost visibility enforcement:
Optimisation levers:
FinOps ownership model:
Product teams
Own their cloud spend
Platform teams
Provide cost tooling and guardrails
Finance
Oversight, forecasting, and governance